਍㰀猀琀礀氀攀 琀礀瀀攀㴀∀琀攀砀琀⼀挀猀猀∀㸀ഀഀ .BODY { background-color: #EAF1F7; background-image: url('images/gtbh.jpg'); background-repeat: no-repeat; background-attachment: fixed; background-position: center; color: #0066CC;} ਍⸀䌀㄀笀琀攀砀琀ⴀ愀氀椀最渀㨀 樀甀猀琀椀昀礀㬀挀漀氀漀爀㨀 ⌀  㘀㘀䌀䌀㬀䘀伀一吀ⴀ猀椀稀攀㨀 匀䴀䄀䰀䰀㬀䘀伀一吀ⴀ昀愀洀椀氀礀㨀 吀愀栀漀洀愀㬀紀ഀഀ .BIB{text-align: center;color: #000099;FONT-size: SMALL;FONT-family: Tahoma;} ਍⸀䌀伀一吀笀琀攀砀琀ⴀ愀氀椀最渀㨀 爀椀最栀琀㬀挀漀氀漀爀㨀 ⌀䘀䘀    㬀䘀伀一吀ⴀ猀椀稀攀㨀 匀䴀䄀䰀䰀㬀䘀伀一吀ⴀ昀愀洀椀氀礀㨀 吀愀栀漀洀愀㬀紀ഀഀ ਍㰀䴀䔀吀䄀 栀琀琀瀀ⴀ攀焀甀椀瘀㴀∀挀漀渀琀攀渀琀ⴀ琀礀瀀攀∀ 挀漀渀琀攀渀琀㴀∀琀攀砀琀⼀栀琀洀氀㬀 挀栀愀爀猀攀琀㴀唀吀䘀ⴀ㠀∀㸀㰀⼀䠀䔀䄀䐀㸀ഀഀ ਍㰀䘀伀一吀 䄀䰀䤀䜀一㴀∀䨀唀匀吀䤀䘀夀∀ 䘀䄀䌀䔀㴀∀吀愀栀漀洀愀∀㸀ഀഀ

ATAR SIṄGH SANDHĀṄVĀLĪĀ (d. 1844), son of Amīr Siṅgh, was a collateral of Mahārājā Raṇjīt Siṅgh. After the direct descendants of the Mahārājā, he, as the eldest of the Sandhāṅvālīā family, stood close to the throne. A daring soldier, Atar Siṅgh was a calculating and shrewd courtier. He took part in several trans-Indus campaigns in Peshāwar and Hazārā. After the death of General Harī Siṅgh Nalvā, he was considered to be the "champion of the Khālsā. " He carried the titles "Ujjal Dīdār [of immaculate appearance], Nirmal Buddh [of clear intelligence], Sardār-i-bā-Waqār [the Sardār with prestige], Kāsir-ul-Iqtadār [eagle of power], Sarwar-i-Garoh-i-Nāmdar [leader of the renowned group], Ālī Tabā' [of exalted nature], Shujā'-ud-Daulā [valour of the State], Sardār Atar Siṅgh Shamsher-i-Jaṅg Bahādur [the valiant sword of battle]. " But he was fickle-minded and ambitious. At Raṇjīt Siṅgh's death he refused to swear fealty either to Khaṛak Siṅgh or Nau Nihāl Siṅgh, and became an active partisan of the Ḍogrā faction at the court. Soon afterwards he changed sides and joined Kaṅvar Nau Nihāl Siṅgh's party against the Ḍogrā minister, Dhiān Siṅgh, and went to Ludhiāṇā to find in the British territory a possible substitute for the Wazīr. When both Khaṛak Siṅgh and Nau Nihāl Siṅgh died in November 1840, he endeavoured to raise a group which would check Ḍogrā dominance at the Darbār, and, at the same time, prevent the succession of Sher Siṅgh. The Sandhāṅvālīās became staunch supporters of Rāṇī Chand Kaur, and Atar Siṅgh Sandhāṅvālīā, who had led a force against Sher Siṅgh when he stormed the Lahore Fort in January 1841, had to flee when the Fort fell. Later feeling insecure in the Punjab, he took asylum in British territory at Thānesar along with his nephew, Ajīt Siṅgh. Both of them kept up an attitude of open hostility towards Mahārājā Sher Siṅgh who had since succeeded to the throne. They solicited British interference in favour of Rāṇī Chand Kaur, and wrote letters to the officers of the Khālsā army inciting them to rise against their sovereign. A mild flutter was caused at Fort William when Atar Siṅgh hobnobbed with Dost Muhammad Khān, the deposed Amīr of Afghanistan at Ludhiāṇā, to what purpose nobody could tell. However when, as a result of British mediation, a reconciliation was brought about between the Sandhāṅvālīās and Mahārājā Sher Siṅgh, they were pardoned and allowed to return to Lahore. But Atar Siṅgh refused to come back to the Punjab, and continued to conspire against the Mahārājā. When in September 1843, Mahārājā Sher Siṅgh was treacherously assassinated by Ajīt Siṅgh Sandhāṅvālīā and Lahiṇā Siṅgh Sandhāṅvālīā, Atar Siṅgh was at Ūnā. On hearing of the retribution which soon overtook both the Sandhāṅvālīā sardārs, he hastily fled to Thānesar before a column of troops sent by Hīrā Siṅgh could capture him.

਍㰀瀀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀䄀琀愀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 氀椀瘀攀搀 椀渀 攀砀椀氀攀 愀琀 吀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀渀攀猀愀爀 愀氀漀渀最 眀椀琀栀 琀栀攀 昀攀眀 爀攀洀渀愀渀琀猀Ⰰ 漀昀 琀栀攀 匀愀渀搀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀瘀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀氀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 昀愀洀椀氀礀 眀栀漀 栀愀搀 攀猀挀愀瀀攀搀 搀攀猀琀爀甀挀琀椀漀渀 椀渀 ㄀㠀㐀㌀ ⴀ 栀椀猀 猀漀渀 䬀攀栀愀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀Ⰰ 愀渀搀 愀 渀攀瀀栀攀眀 刀愀☀⌀㜀㜀㔀㄀樀漀搀栀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀Ⰰ 愀 戀爀漀琀栀攀爀 漀昀 䄀樀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀琀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀⸀ 䠀攀 渀甀爀猀攀搀 攀渀洀椀琀礀 愀最愀椀渀猀琀 䠀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 愀渀搀 欀攀瀀琀 椀渀 琀漀甀挀栀 眀椀琀栀 琀栀攀 搀椀猀愀昀昀攀挀琀攀搀 攀氀攀洀攀渀琀猀 椀渀 琀栀攀 倀甀渀樀愀戀⸀ 圀栀攀渀 椀渀 䴀愀礀 ㄀㠀㐀㐀Ⰰ 䬀愀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀瘀愀爀 倀愀猀栀愀甀爀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 愀渀搀 䬀愀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀瘀愀爀 䬀愀猀栀洀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 爀攀瘀漀氀琀攀搀Ⰰ 栀攀 爀愀椀猀攀搀 愀 猀洀愀氀氀 昀漀爀挀攀 愀渀搀 樀漀椀渀攀搀 琀栀攀洀 愀琀 一愀甀爀愀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最☀⌀㈀㔀㜀戀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀搀 愀昀琀攀爀 挀爀漀猀猀椀渀最 琀栀攀 匀甀琀氀攀樀Ⰰ 渀攀愀爀 䠀愀爀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀欀攀⸀ 吀栀攀 䰀愀栀漀爀攀 䐀愀爀戀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀爀 瀀爀漀琀攀猀琀攀搀 琀漀 琀栀攀 䈀爀椀琀椀猀栀 愀琀 䰀甀搀栀椀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㜀㜀㔀㄀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 昀漀爀 愀氀氀漀眀椀渀最 琀栀攀 爀攀戀攀氀猀 瀀愀猀猀愀最攀 琀栀爀漀甀最栀 琀栀攀椀爀 琀攀爀爀椀琀漀爀礀⸀ 䄀 匀椀欀栀 昀漀爀挀攀 ㈀ Ⰰ     猀琀爀漀渀最 甀渀搀攀爀 䴀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀 䰀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀戀栀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 愀渀搀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 䜀甀氀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀戀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 挀爀漀猀猀攀搀 琀栀攀 匀甀琀氀攀樀 愀渀搀 猀甀爀爀漀甀渀搀攀搀 琀栀攀 㰀椀㸀☀⌀㜀㘀㤀㌀攀爀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀㰀⼀椀㸀 漀昀 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 䈀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 一愀甀爀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀渀最☀⌀㈀㔀㜀戀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀搀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀⸀ 䠀漀眀攀瘀攀爀Ⰰ 琀栀攀 䰀愀栀漀爀攀 挀漀洀洀愀渀搀攀爀猀Ⰰ 爀攀猀瀀攀挀琀椀渀最 琀栀攀 猀愀渀挀琀椀琀礀 漀昀 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 䈀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀Ⰰ 爀攀瀀愀椀爀攀搀 琀漀 栀椀猀 挀愀洀瀀 琀漀 戀爀椀渀最 愀戀漀甀琀 愀渀 愀洀椀挀愀戀氀攀 猀攀琀琀氀攀洀攀渀琀⸀ 䄀猀 渀攀最漀琀椀愀琀椀漀渀猀 眀攀爀攀 椀渀 瀀爀漀最爀攀猀猀Ⰰ 䄀琀愀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 昀氀攀眀 椀渀琀漀 愀 爀愀最攀 愀渀搀 昀愀琀愀氀氀礀 猀琀愀戀戀攀搀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 䜀甀氀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀戀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 眀椀琀栀 栀椀猀 搀愀最最攀爀⸀ 吀栀攀 愀琀琀攀渀搀愀渀琀猀 漀昀 琀栀攀 䜀攀渀攀爀愀氀 椀渀猀琀愀渀琀氀礀 昀攀氀氀 甀瀀漀渀 䄀琀愀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 愀渀搀 栀愀挀欀攀搀 栀椀洀 琀漀 瀀椀攀挀攀猀⸀ 吀栀椀猀 眀愀猀 椀渀 䴀愀礀 ㄀㠀㐀㐀⸀㰀⼀瀀㸀ഀഀ ਍㰀瀀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䈀䤀䈀∀㸀ഀഀ BIBLIOGRAPHY

  1. Griffin, Lepel, and C. F. Massy, Chiefs and Families of Note in the Punjab. Lahore, 1909
    ਍㰀氀椀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀 䠀愀爀戀愀渀猀 匀椀渀最栀Ⰰ 㰀椀㸀吀栀攀 䠀攀爀椀琀愀最攀 漀昀 琀栀攀 匀椀欀栀猀⸀ 㰀⼀椀㸀 䐀攀氀栀椀Ⰰ ㄀㤀㠀㌀㰀䈀刀㸀ഀഀ
  2. Smyth, G. Carmichael, A History of the Reigning Family of Lahore. Delhi, 1982
    ਍㰀氀椀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀 匀☀⌀㌀㘀㌀爀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀Ⰰ 匀漀栀愀渀 䰀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀氀Ⰰ 㰀椀㸀 ✀唀洀搀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀琀ⴀ甀琀ⴀ吀眀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀爀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀㰀甀㸀欀栀㰀⼀甀㸀⸀ 㰀⼀椀㸀 䰀愀栀漀爀攀Ⰰ ㄀㠀㠀㔀ⴀ㠀㤀㰀䈀刀㸀ഀഀ

B. J. Hasrat


਍㰀⼀昀漀渀琀㸀ഀഀ ਍㰀⼀䠀吀䴀䰀㸀㰀⼀䈀伀䐀夀㸀ഀഀ